JMARK: time sheet review
Reviews weekly time sheets against business rules so managers spot issues faster and spend less time on routine review.
AI Workflow Diagnostic
Know whether to build, pilot, or stop.
We review one important AI workflow before you spend on software, tools, or implementation, then give you a clear next step.
- One important workflow reviewed in plain language
- Value, owner, risk, examples, systems, and readiness
- A decision before implementation spend
AI workflows that save team time
Chordoma Patient Navigator
Helps staff answer patient navigation questions from approved source content, so responses come back faster and more consistently.
SGF Trip Assistant
Answers visitor questions from approved trip content so the team saves time and the public gets reliable answers.
View the assistantDiagnostic snapshot
Save time & build safely.
We check value, risk, ownership, evidence, and readiness before your team commits to implementation.
Best for
Leaders weighing a workflow that affects cost, quality, speed, or risk.
What we review
Problem, owner, steps, examples, systems, rules, value, risk, and human review.
What you get
A recommendation to build, pilot, hand off, pause, or stop.
For workflow automation that makes your company faster, better, and safer.
Good fit
- A repeated workflow affects cost, quality, speed, or risk.
- A leader can sponsor the decision.
- The team can share examples, edge cases, systems, rules, and quality standards.
- The recommendation will shape investment, ownership, or timing.
Usually not a fit
- The main need is a keynote, broad AI inspiration session, or generic tool training.
- The workflow lacks an owner or examples we can review.
- A chatbot is the main need, but ownership and quality standards are unclear.
After the diagnostic
The decision you get
The diagnostic ends with one of these recommendations.
Recommendation
Build
Move forward when the problem, owner, data, review path, and value are clear.
- Access boundaries
- Human review
- Implementation plan
Recommendation
Clarify
Close gaps in ownership, process, value, or risk before scoping a solution.
- Owner map
- Value and risk model
- Current-state review
Recommendation
Pilot or hand off
Run a small test or move the work to the team best equipped to own it.
- Readiness review
- Pilot scope
- Handoff path
Recommendation
Plan adoption
Plan the training, controls, and ownership needed for the workflow to stick.
- Team alignment
- Quality controls
- Workflow playbook
Diagnostic process
How the diagnostic works
We frame the decision, map the current work, shape the AI option, and define the next path.
- 1
Frame the decision
Name the problem, owner, success criteria, boundaries, and why the workflow matters.
- 2
Map the work
Document how the work happens today: steps, systems, handoffs, examples, and constraints.
- 3
Shape the option
Review where AI fits, where people review, what risks matter, and what would need to change.
- 4
Recommend the path
Define the scope boundary and the evidence needed to build, pilot, hand off, pause, or stop.
Use the diagnostic when a workflow could affect cost, quality, speed, or risk.
Request a DiagnosticDiagnose the workflow before you build.
Tell us the workflow, owner, and what would improve if the decision were clear.